How can an administrator test data consistency after migrating sales agreements?

Verifying the migration file and comparing randomly selected lines with the legacy system is a practical way to ensure data consistency after migrating sales agreements. This method allows the administrator to check specific instances of migrated data against entries in the legacy system, confirming that key fields and values match between the two systems. This targeted approach provides a reasonable level of assurance that the migration process was executed correctly while being manageable in terms of time and resources.

By comparing randomly selected lines, the administrator also reduces the risk of bias in the verification process, ensuring a fair representation of the data's integrity. This method can serve as a sampling technique, which can often reveal systemic issues if discrepancies are present.

Other approaches, while potentially useful, may not directly provide a concise verification of migrated data consistency. For instance, creating custom reports to aggregate values could take considerable time and assume that the legacy data is accurate without providing a specific line-item verification. Using Data Loader to generate a .csv file for manual comparison, while it may facilitate some level of verification, can be cumbersome and time-intensive, especially with large datasets. Running a full system audit, while thorough, may be excessive in resource allocation and may not yield immediate insights on the accuracy of individual lines compared to the legacy data as effectively as